"... All my questions, concerns and problems have been resolved in an efficient way. I recommend this firm to anyone who has to deal with any immigration service." - Jairo Fernandez, MD, Florida
- Employer Compliance
- Employment Immigration
- Family Immigration
- Firm News
- Immigration Litigation and Removal
- Legislation and Policy
- Medical Professionals
Under this program, certain eligible Haitian beneficiaries of approved family-sponsored immigrant visa petitions, who are currently in Haiti, can come to the United States as early as two years before they are eligible to receive permanent residence. In other words, they will be “paroled” into the U.S. to be with their families until the green card is available.
“The rebuilding and development of a safe and economically strong Haiti is a priority for the United States. The Haitian Family Reunification Parole program promotes a fundamental underlying goal of our immigration system – family reunification. It also supports broader U.S. goals for Haiti’s reconstruction and development by providing the opportunity for certain eligible Haitians to safely and legally immigrate sooner to the United States,” said Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas. “The United States strongly discourages individuals in Haiti from undertaking life-threatening and illegal maritime journeys to the United States. Such individuals will not qualify for the HFRP program and if located at sea may be returned to Haiti.”
In early 2015, the Department of State National Visa Center (NVC) will begin contacting qualified U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents with approved petitions for Haitian family members, offer them the opportunity to apply to the program, and provide instructions on how to apply. Only individuals who receive a written notice of program eligibility from NVC will be eligible to apply.
The USCIS is not accepting HFRP program applications yet so if you believe you or a family member is eligible, DO NOT apply at this time. Instead, contact a qualified immigration attorney who can monitor the situation for you and help you apply at the right time.
And remember, only attorneys and accredited legal services can represent you before the government. The USCIS warns against scams so visit http://www.uscis.gov/avoid-scams for tips on filing forms, reporting scams, and finding accredited legal services. Remember, the Wrong Help Can Hurt!
To consult with one of our qualified attorneys, you are invited to call 214-672-2000 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Green Card Application Portability – 5 Questions to Ask Before Changing Jobs While Waiting for Your Green Card Approval
Green card applicants often ask if they are able to change employment while waiting for final approval. The answer is yes, if you follow established portability rules. Generally, if your I-485 application has been pending for 180 days or more, you are eligible to change jobs and continue your green card application. However, portability rules have pitfalls you must avoid, or your green card application can be denied.
Here are five key questions you need to get answered before making any change in employers.
1. Is my application dependent upon my employer? If your green card category depends upon a job offer, then your application is dependent upon your employer (“sponsor”) and you must observe portability rules to avoid denial of your green card application. Currently, the green card categories requiring a job offer and subject to portability rules are EB-1 Outstanding Researcher, EB-1 Multinational Manager, EB-2 and EB-3 workers based upon labor certification.
Green card applications based upon EB-1 Extraordinary Ability and EB-2 National Interest Waiver do not require a job offer and do not fall under portability rules. Therefore, applicants in these categories can change employers at any time so long as they continue to work in the field of extraordinary ability or national interest, as applicable.
2. Has the I-140 petition been approved? If your I-140 petition has been approved, then your chances of approval based upon portability are better.
If you change positions after your I-485 has been pending for 180 days and your I-140 is approved, then your green card can be approved, even if your sponsor cancels the I-140 petition. On the other hand, if you change positions while your I-140 petition is awaiting approval, your sponsor’s withdrawal of the I-140 petition will cause denial of your I-485 application.
Even if your sponsor does not withdraw the pending I-140 petition, the government could deny the I-140 petition for other reasons. As a result, your I-485 application will be denied even if it has been pending for 180 days.
To avoid these risks, wait until the I-140 is approved before changing positions.
3. Has the I-485 application been pending for more than 180 days? Even if your I-140 petition is approved, it’s risky to leave your employment before the “safe harbor” period starts.
Although the government cannot deny your I-485 application on the sole basis that you left your employer before 180 days have passed, it can issue a request for evidence (RFE) to determine whether the original offer of employment was bona fide. Your sponsor’s support could be necessary to respond to the RFE and its refusal to cooperate could mean denial of your I-485 application.
Also, if your sponsor withdraws the approved the I-140 petition before the 180 days have run, portability will not apply and your green card application will be denied.
To avoid these risks, wait until your I-485 application has processed for 180 days before changing positions.
4. Is the new employment in the “same or similar” occupation? To determine whether the new position is comparable to the sponsored position, the government looks at the following factors and you should do the same:
- The description of the job duties in the PERM (ETA9089) application or I-140 petition and the job duties of the new employment.
- The standard occupational classification (SOC) code shown on the ETA9089 application or I-140 petition for the sponsored position and the SOC code for the new position.
- A substantial difference between the previous wage and the new wage (higher or lower).
5. Will the new employer provide a supporting letter for your I-485 application? The government usually requires an update on your employment status before approving your green card. Your new employer should provide a letter describing your new position, including duties and responsibilities as well the salary of the position. Be sure the new employer agrees to provide this letter before you change jobs.
Portability rules are complex. Contact a qualified immigration attorney to ensure a safe transition to your new employment.
The information provided in this article is intended to help you understand basic issues involved in the immigration process, and are offered only for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not offered as, nor does it constitute legal advice or legal opinions. You should not act or rely upon the information in this article without first seeking the advice of an immigration attorney.
From League of Women Voters
On Constitution Day, September 17, we commemorate the signing of theU.S. Constitution in 1787. Constitution Day, also known as Citizenship Day, is when we honor our democracy by celebrating our rights and responsibilities as citizens. It’s the perfect time to celebrate the right to vote, the very cornerstone of citizenship!
Applicants for green cards and other immigration benefits must attend a biometrics appointment at a designated USCIS Application Support Center (ASC) whenever requested. Generally, the applicant receives an ASC appointment notice for a specific date and time. Most can attend the appointment on the date and time scheduled, but what if the date is inconvenient? Here are some of the options available in this situation:
- Reschedule – the applicant can reschedule by marking the rescheduling request field on the ASC appointment notice and returning it to the USCIS before the appointment date. Keep a copy of the notice for your records and be sure to send the notice through a delivery method that allows tracking, e.g. certified mail. You do not need to explain the reason for rescheduling. Unlike a doctor’s or lawyer’s appointment, you cannot reserve a specific date. You will receive a new notice usually within two weeks.
- Go early – the applicant can to the ASC earlier than the appointment date as a “walk-in.” Be sure to bring your appointment notice and politely request that your biometrics be taken. Be prepared to wait until others with current appointments are served. After your biometrics are taken, ask for a completion stamp on your appointment notice so you have proof that biometrics were completed.
- Outside U.S. – applicants who are overseas at the time of the biometrics appointment must reschedule. There are no facilities available outside the U.S. that can provide general biometrics appointments. If the applicant has an attorney, the attorney can request the rescheduling of the appointment.
- Disability – applicants who have a hearing, sight, speech, or other physical impairment that might prevent attendance at the appointment can and should request an accommodation by calling the customer service center for the USCIS or completing a request online at https://egov.uscis.gov/e-request/displayAccomForm.do?entryPoint=init&sroPageType=accommodations. The USCIS may provide additional assistance at the appointment or may reschedule the appointment when additional assistance is available.
To address your unique immigration situation, you are invited to contact our firm at email@example.com, 214-672-2000.
The information provided in this article is intended to help you understand basic issues involved in the immigration process , and are offered only for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not offered as, nor does it constitute legal advice or legal opinions. You should not act or rely upon the information in this article without first seeking the advice of an immigration attorney.
Governmental investigations and audits to assess compliance with employment and immigration laws have steadily increased over the last few years. Employment lawsuits and immigration compliance violations are at a record high. And there is no indication that the trend will decline anytime soon. Businesses which do not routinely audit their internal policies and procedures or which have neglected to develop and implement policies at all, are vulnerable to fines, claims, penalties, and the potential of governmental oversight. (Keep reading →)
Immigration and immigration compliance is in the headlines on a daily basis affecting both large and small companies. If you are the human resources director for a company looking for the professional services of an individual who requires a visa to work in the United States, you need to consider the full range of options and strategies available to you with respect to one of the most commonly used employment (professional) visas — the H-1B visa. (Keep reading →)
The Wall Street Journal reports today that President Obama may suspend deportations and give work permits to millions of undocumented immigrants. The executive branch of our government is headed by the President and does manage and control the immigration process. Most legal experts agree that the President can act without Congress in many ways. For example, many Presidents have exercised power to grant deferred action and temporary protected status (TPS). This WSJ journal nicely explains some of the executive actions under consideration. According to the article, the President may announce his executive order shortly after Labor Day.
Cowles & Thompson Immigration Law Group is following this story closely.
Read the Wall Street Journal article
Since 1986, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) requires employers to complete the I-9 form to verify that all new employees are authorized to work in the United States. An employer who fails to properly fill out the form for each employee can face stiff fines and penalties. These paperwork violations can range from $110 to $1100 in fines, even if all your employees are work authorized. (Keep reading →)
Takeaway for Employers – Do Not Require I-9 Specific Documents from New Employees
On June 12, 2014, the Justice Department reached an agreement with Commercial Cleaning Systems, a janitorial services company with headquarters in Denver. The agreement resolves claims that the company discriminated against work-authorized non-U.S. citizens in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
The department’s investigation was initiated based on a referral from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The investigation found that Commercial Cleaning Systems required work-authorized non-U.S. citizens to present specific documentation issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in order to verify their employment eligibility, while U.S. citizens were permitted to present their choice of documentation. The INA’s anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from placing additional documentary burdens on work-authorized employees during the hiring and employment eligibility verification process based on their citizenship status or national origin.
Under the settlement agreement, Commercial Cleaning Systems will pay $53,500 in civil penalties, create a $25,000 back pay fund to compensate individuals who may have lost wages as a result of the company’s discriminatory document practices, and be subject to monitoring of its employment eligibility verification practices for one year.
“Discriminating against work-authorized employees because they are not citizens violates federal law and the Justice Department is committed to enforcing this law,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jocelyn Samuels for the Civil Rights Division. “We applaud Commercial Cleaning Systems for working cooperatively with the division to resolve this matter.”
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) is responsible for enforcing the anti-discrimination provision of the INA. The statute also prohibits, among other things, citizenship status and national origin discrimination in hiring, firing and recruitment or referral for a fee. The case was handled by OSC Trial Attorney Linda White Andrews.
Ann Massey Badmus is a shareholder and head of the Immigration Law section of Cowles & Thompson. In this interview on June 14th, 2014 in San Francisco, California she is asked about immigrant children crossing into the United States.